05:53 -
No comments


Critical Legal Studies
CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES
ü
Started off in the United States in 1970’s to provide radical change to established legal
theories
ü
Challenges the western jurisprudence on the part
“universal foundation for law through reason”
ü
Does not accept the legal theory of politically
neutral and it is an objective way to resolve conflicts
ü
Marx view law part of superstructure and CLS
scholars view it as essential for the continuation of a liberal society
ü
Duncan
Kennedy: Law is an aspect of the social totality not just the tail of the
dog
ü
Critique Marxism saying domination and exploitation
is not the monopoly of any theory but characteristics of all theories which
makes claim which makes truth on the grand scale. (talking on truthfulness
being the main idea)
ü
Critics both the communism and Marxist theory –
see example radical Islam & Christianity
ü
Argued that the law is portrayed as rational,
coherent, just and necessary but in fact it is arbitrary, unnecessary and
unjust
ü
Claims that concept such as the Rule of Law, basic
civil & political rights that so called gives freedom of speech and what
not = tools that serves as a political and economic requirement which deceives
both ends (people and the law itself)
ü
Although those rights are argued as individual
fulfillment, still serve as political and economic requirements
ü
For example: the minimum wage legislation was
strike down as interfering in the freedom of contract but what would it be said
on the development of unfair contracts?
ü
Example rights of coloured people achieved in
the constitution not by belittling them because CLS don’t agree on this making
a big fuss
ü
Take example of rights of the white and black
children in school as well and the promulgation of Civil Rights Act 1964.
ü
Duncan
Kennedy à said that people
believed such concepts of “free market”, “freedom under the law” as true
ü
Marx à said that it is
false consciousness because he believes capitalist states embraced ideology
that they are responsible for their situation
ü
Noam
Chomsky à consent can also
be manufactured (meaning fake)
ü
Criticized on the formalization of the law because
it does not take into consideration on the values, social goals or political
& economic concept
ü
McCoubrey
and White à
even within liberal legal tradition Hart
& Dworkin (at that era) recognized that law is much more complex
0 comments:
Post a Comment